From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Piemonte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 10, 2000
271 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 10, 2000.

Disciplinary Proceedings instituted by the Grievance Committee of the Fifth Judicial District. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on June 26, 1980, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department.

Final order of suspension entered.

Anthony J. Gigliotti, Syracuse, for Fifth Judicial District Grievance Committee.

Rossi Vavonese, Syracuse (Emil M. Rossi of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., GREEN, PINE, WISNER AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on June 26, 1980, and maintained an office for the practice of law in Syracuse. Respondent formerly served as a Village Justice for the Village of Solvay. On June 22, 1999, respondent was convicted upon his plea of guilty in Town of Geddes Justice Court of tampering with a witness in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 215.10), a class A misdemeanor. Respondent admitted that he used his position as a Village Justice to attempt to induce a witness to absent himself from an administrative hearing. On December 20, 1999, respondent was sentenced to an unconditional discharge in consideration of community service that he had previously performed. This Court determined that tampering with a witness in the fourth degree is a serious crime pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (d), and, on January 26, 2000, entered an order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why a final order of discipline should not be entered. Respondent appeared before the Court and submitted matters in mitigation.

We note, in mitigation, that respondent admitted his misconduct and expressed extreme remorse. Additionally, with the exception of this incident, respondent has an unblemished record after practicing law for a period of 20 years. After consideration of all of the factors in this matter, we conclude that respondent should be suspended for six months, effective January 26, 2000, and until further order of the Court.

Final order of suspension entered.


Summaries of

Matter of Piemonte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 10, 2000
271 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Piemonte

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF SALVATORE J. PIEMONTE, A SUSPENDED ATTORNEY, RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 10, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 915

Citing Cases

Piemonte v. Grievance Comm. of the Fifth Judicial Dist.

Although the Grievance Committee alleges that respondent violated certain other provisions of the Rules of…