From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pielsticker v. Hockert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1935
245 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

July, 1935.

Appeal from Queens County.

In our opinion, the respondent failed to sustain the burden upon him of proving the charges against the petitioner by a preponderance of evidence. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Matter of Pielsticker v. Hockert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1935
245 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Matter of Pielsticker v. Hockert

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of HENRY PIELSTICKER, Also Known as HARRY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1935

Citations

245 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)