Matter of Phillips Petroleum Co.

38 Citing cases

  1. McCathern v. City of Oklahoma City

    2004 OK 61 (Okla. 2004)   Cited 12 times

    Without clear legislative direction, these two capacities cannot be intermixed. Nelson v. Pollay, 1996 OK 142, ¶ 6, 916 P.2d 1369, 1373 (citing Anderson v. Eichner, 1994 OK 136, ¶ 11, 890 P.2d 1329, 1336 n. 15); So-Lo Oil Company, Inc. v. Total Petroleum, Inc., 1992 OK 71, ¶ 8, 832 P.2d 14, 18; Humphrey v. Denney, 1988 OK 69, ¶ 8, 757 P.2d 833, 835; Matter of Phillips Petroleum Co., 1982 OK 112, ¶ 5, 652 P.2d 283, 285; Lancaster v. State, 1967 OK 84, ¶ 6, 426 P.2d 714, 716; State v. Dinwiddie, 1939 OK 406, ¶ 10, 95 P.2d 867, 869 (1939). The terms of 12 O.S. 2001 § 2[ 12-2] state:

  2. Federal Power Commission v. Un. Producing Co.

    230 F.2d 36 (D.C. Cir. 1956)   Cited 3 times

    mers declining to deal with it; that it faces the problem of third party contractors refusing to pay the increased prices called for by contract and refusing to make reimbursement of taxes advanced by the company under contract and from the loss of benefit of escalation provisions in existing contracts, as well as the threatened inability to dispose of future supplies of natural gas produced by it. Furthermore, the company states that failure to comply with the newly promulgated regulations of the Commission will subject it unduly to the risk and threat of severe fines and penalties provided by the Natural Gas Act. The entire controversy in these cases revolves around the decision of the Supreme Court in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. State of Wisconsin, 1954, 347 U.S. 672, 74 S.Ct. 794, 98 L.Ed. 1035, affirming the decision of this court in State of Wisconsin v. Federal Power Commission, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 284, 205 F.2d 706, which reversed the decision of the Federal Power Commission In the Matter of Phillips Petroleum Co., 1951, 10 F.P.C. 246, 90 P.U.R., N.S., 325. The series of orders designated as Order Nos. 174, 174-A and 174-B stem directly from the decision in the Phillips case, supra, and were promulgated by the Commission to adapt the Commission's rules and regulations to that decision. Following the decision of the Supreme Court on June 7, 1954, the Commission, on July 16, 1954, issued Order No. 174 prescribing procedural rules of general applicability to those persons, "independent producers and gatherers," determined by that decision to be within the purview of the Natural Gas Act and subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission.

  3. Bailey v. State ex rel. Bd. of Tests for Alcohol & Drug Influence

    2022 OK 50 (Okla. 2022)   Cited 4 times

    Assessments for Tax Year 2012 of Certain Props. Owned by Throneberry v. Wright, 2021 OK 7, n.21, 481 P.3d 883 (citing Smicklas v. Spitz, 1992 OK 145, 846 P.2d 362; Matter of Phillips Petroleum Co., 1982 OK 112, 652 P.2d 283, 285). Id. 2021 OK 7, n.23, 481 P.3d at 892 (citing City of Tulsa v. State ex rel. Public Employees Relations Bd., 1998 OK 92, ¶14, 967 P.2d 1214, 1220)

  4. Crowe v. Wright

    2021 OK 7 (Okla. 2021)   Cited 8 times

    This analysis starts with the language of the statutes at issue, and whether statutory language is ambiguous, conflicting, or its meaning uncertain, and this analysis presents a question of law reviewed de novo by the Court.Smicklas v. Spitz , 1992 OK 145, 846 P.2d 362 ; Matter of Phillips Petroleum Co. , 1982 OK 112, 652 P.2d 283, 285.McNeill v. City of Tulsa , 1998 OK 2, ¶9, 953 P.2d 329, 332.

  5. State v. Colclazier

    1997 OK 134 (Okla. 1997)   Cited 42 times
    In State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. Colclazier, 1997 OK 134, 950 P.2d 824, the Supreme Court affirmed the district court's authority to reject DHS's foster care placement, although it did not address whether the court had the authority to direct DHS to place a child in a specific foster home.

    Fuller v. Odom, 1987 OK 64, 741 P.2d 449, 453; Darnell v.Chrysler Corp., 1984 OK 57, 687 P.2d 132, 134; Independent School Dist. No. 89 v. Oklahoma Fed'n of Teachers, 1980 OK 89, 612 P.2d 719, 723.Copeland v. Stone, 1992 OK 154, 842 P.2d 754, 756; Fuller v.Odom, see note 3, supra; Matter of Phillips Petroleum Co., 1982 OK 112, 652 P.2d 283, 285.Copeland v. Stone, see note 4, supra; Fuller v. Odom, see note 3, supra.

  6. Minie v. City of Okmulgee

    1997 OK 26 (Okla. 1997)   Cited 73 times
    In Minie v. Hudson we looked at this "A claim... shall be" and explained it clearly expressed a legislative intent and will commanding a GTCA claim to be in writing.

    Fuller v. Odom, 741 P.2d 449, 453 (Okla. 1987); Darnell v. Chrysler Corp., 687 P.2d 132, 134 (Okla. 1984); Independent School Dist. No. 89 v. Oklahoma Fed'n of Teachers, 612 P.2d 719, 723 (Okla. 1980).Copeland v. Stone, 842 P.2d 754, 756 (Okla. 1992);Fuller v. Odom, see note 14, supra; Matter of Phillips Petroleum Co., 652 P.2d 283, 285 (Okla. 1982).Copeland v. Stone, see note 15, supra; Fuller v. Odom, see note 14, supra.

  7. Nelson v. Pollay

    1996 OK 142 (Okla. 1996)   Cited 27 times

    We agree. Anderson, supra note 11 at 1337; So-Lo Oil Company, Inc. v. Total Petroleum, Inc., Okla., 832 P.2d 14, 18 (1992); Humphrey v. Denney, Okla., 757 P.2d 833, 835 (1988); Matter of Phillips Petroleum Co., Okla., 652 P.2d 283, 28; (1982); Lancaster v. State, Okla., 426 P.2d 714, 716 (1967); State v. Dinwiddie, 186 Okla. 63, 95 P.2d 867, 869 (1939). State employees acting within the scope of their employment are relieved by § 152.1(A) of private liability for tortious conduct.

  8. Ass'n for Equitable Tax. v. Oklahoma City

    1995 OK 62 (Okla. 1995)   Cited 83 times
    Holding that a city may create classes of taxpayers for the purpose of the municipal sales tax

    We find that pursuant to 68 O.S. 1991 § 2701[ 68-2701](A), a city may create classes of taxpayers for the purpose of the levy and collection of a municipal sales taxes. Smicklas v. Spitz, see note 10, supra; Fuller v. Odom, see note 14 at 452, supra; Matter of Phillips Petroleum Co., 652 P.2d 283, 285 (Okla. 1982).TRW/Reda Pump v. Brewington, 829 P.2d 15, 20 (Okla.

  9. City of Hugo v. State ex rel. Public Employees Relations Bd.

    1994 OK 134 (Okla. 1994)   Cited 51 times

    Board of Examiners v. Tubbs, 307 P.2d 830, 831-32 (Okla. 1957).Fuller v. Odom, 741 P.2d 449, 452 (Okla. 1987); Matter of Phillips Petroleum Co., 652 P.2d 283, 285 (Okla. 1982); Becknell v. State Indus. Court, 512 P.2d 1180, 1183 (Okla. 1973). It is undisputed that nothing in the language of 11 O.S. 1991 § 51-104b[ 11-51-104b](C) affords the PERB the express authority to enter a cease and desist order requiring affirmative relief. The public policy of the Act is expressed in § 51-101(B) and (C). Subsection (B) accords firefighters and police officers all rights of labor, with the exclusion of the right to strike.

  10. Anderson v. Eichner

    1994 OK 136 (Okla. 1994)   Cited 50 times
    Recounting that the Oklahoma Supreme Court abrogated the common-law doctrine of sovereign immunity and "[t]he legislature responded to [the court's] invitation to codify Oklahoma's sovereign immunity policies by enacting the 1984 Governmental Tort Claims Act"

    We agree. So-Lo Oil Company, Inc. v. Total Petroleum, Inc., Okla., 832 P.2d 14, 18 (1992); Humphrey v. Denney, Okla., 757 P.2d 833, 835 (1988); Matter of Phillips Petroleum Co., Okla., 652 P.2d 283, 285 (1982); Lancaster v. State, Okla., 426 P.2d 714, 716 (1967); State v. Dinwiddie, 186 Okla. 63, 95 P.2d 867, 869 (1939). Section 152(5)'s language creates a dichotomous division of physicians into two distinct categories: (a) teachers or students and (b) practitioners of medicine.