Opinion
January 21, 1999.
Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.
Claimant was discharged from her employment as an administrator for a telemarketing firm after the employer discovered through a newspaper article that claimant recently was convicted of a felony. Claimant had signed a statement at the time she was hired that required her to immediately notify the employer of any criminal convictions. Given this condition of her employment, substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant's failure to disclose such information to the employer constitutes disqualifying misconduct ( see, e.g., Matter of Egelberg [Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 684; Matter of Bucknor [Hudacs], 205 A.D.2d 816). We reject claimant's assertion that the Board exceeded its authority in assessing the credibility of the witnesses differently than the Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ). While considerable weight is accorded to the credibility determinations of the ALJ, the Board is not bound thereby and is free to resolve credibility issues differently from the ALJ ( see, Matter of Guibert [Commissioner of Labor], 254 A.D.2d 661; Matter of Lugo [Milford Mgt. — Commissioner of Labor], 251 A.D.2d 742, appeal dismissed 92 N.Y.2d 939). Claimant's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
Crew III, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Peters, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.