From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Petremont

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 1925
213 App. Div. 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Opinion

June 12, 1925.

Appeal from Surrogate's Court of the County of New York.

Michael J. Horan, for the appellant.

Elliott Robeson [ Robert J. Robeson of counsel; Maxwell Hall Elliott with him on the brief], for the respondent.


The decree of the surrogate adjudged that out of the cash balance of income the trustee herein retain the sum of $1,342.20 for his costs and disbursements as taxed on the accounting. In this respect the decree follows the report of the referee, to which the appellant took due exception.

It has long been the law in this State that the trust fund itself shall bear the expenses of administration and that no part thereof can be taken from income. ( Woodruff v. N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co., 129 N.Y. 27; Chisolm v. Hamersley, 114 App. Div. 565.) In the case last cited, Mr. Justice HOUGHTON, writing for this court, said (at p. 569): "With regard to the expenses of the accounting, we think the court was right in charging them against the corpus of the estate instead of the income, or apportioning them between the two. It is a general rule that the trust fund must bear the expense of its administration. ( Woodruff v. N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co., 129 N.Y. 27.)" In the recent case of Matter of Eddy ( 207 App. Div. 162) this court unanimously held (p. 164) that the costs and expenses incident to an accounting "should be [charged] against the corpus of the estate entirely, and not apportioned ratably between the life tenant and remainderman, as was done by the surrogate. ( Chisolm v. Hamersley, 114 App. Div. 565; Robertson v. DeBrulatour, 188 N.Y. 301.)"

The beneficiary, I think, was entitled to the net income produced by the trust fund for her benefit untolled by the expenses of the accounting.

The decree appealed from should be modified by striking out the provision for the retention by the trustee of said sum of $1,342.20 for his costs and disbursements on this accounting, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

CLARKE, P.J., and FINCH, J., concur; MARTIN and BURR, JJ., dissent.

Decree modified by striking out the provision for the retention by the trustee of the sum of $1,342.20 for his costs and disbursements on this accounting, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Matter of Petremont

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 1925
213 App. Div. 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
Case details for

Matter of Petremont

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 12, 1925

Citations

213 App. Div. 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
210 N.Y.S. 379

Citing Cases

Nail v. American Nat. Bank of Bristow

In suits for accounting, the costs and expenses are chargeable generally against the principal rather than…

Bryant v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Under the established rule in New York, only those expenses properly chargeable against income are deductible…