From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pessel v. Macy Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 23, 1973
304 N.E.2d 565 (N.Y. 1973)

Opinion

Argued October 11, 1973

Decided October 23, 1973

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Anne G. Kafka for appellants. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Henriette Frieder, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board, on the opinion at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, BREITEL, GABRIELLI, JONES and WACHTLER. Judge JASEN dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: I would reverse the order of the Appellate Division and dismiss the claim on the ground that the record does not support a finding of "suddenness of causation" or "suddenness of result", an essential element of a compensable industrial accident. (See Matter of Greensmith v. Franklin Nat. Bank, 21 A.D.2d 576, affd. 16 N.Y.2d 973.)


Summaries of

Matter of Pessel v. Macy Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 23, 1973
304 N.E.2d 565 (N.Y. 1973)
Case details for

Matter of Pessel v. Macy Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MIRIAM PESSEL, Respondent, v. R.H. MACY CO., INC. et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 23, 1973

Citations

304 N.E.2d 565 (N.Y. 1973)
304 N.E.2d 565
349 N.Y.S.2d 995

Citing Cases

Middleton v. Coxsackie Fac

ases in this court commits us to a different conclusion." The test, as enunciated therein by the Court of…

McCabe v. Watertown Corr. Facility

The employer argues that there is an absence of proof establishing that claimant sustained an accidental…