Opinion
November, 1926.
Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that there is no proof of dependency. All concur.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Perry v. Roman Landscape Contracting Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Summaries of
Matter of Perry v. Roman Landscape Contracting Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for
Matter of Perry v. Roman Landscape Contracting Co.
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ESSIE PERRY, Respondent, against ROMAN…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1926
Citations
218 App. Div. 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)