Opinion
April 4, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Stanley Parness, J.].
Substantial evidence supports the determination that petitioner violated the geographical and use restrictions on his business premises pistol license and target license. Such a violation is indicative of poor judgment in the handling of a weapon, which is grounds for revoking a pistol license ( see, Matter of Gordon v LaCava, 203 A.D.2d 290). The other circumstances of this case support respondent's determination. Accordingly, the penalty of revocation is not disproportionate to the offense nor shocking to our sense of fairness ( Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233). We have considered petitioner's other contentions and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.