From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Perlin v. Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1997
240 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 9, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The notice given to the petitioner by the Superintendent of Schools of the respondent South Orangetown Central School District that he would recommend to the Board of Education that her probationary employment be discontinued was not a final determination subject to review in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (see, CPLR 7803). In any event, even if we assume that the Board had issued a final determination, the petitioner has not raised a triable issue of fact that such determination was for a constitutionally impermissible reason, violative of a statute, or done in bad faith (see, CPLR 7804 [h]; Matter of Frasier v. Board of Educ., 71 N.Y.2d 763).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Thompson and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Perlin v. Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1997
240 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Perlin v. Central School District

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOAN PERLIN, Appellant, v. SOUTH ORANGETOWN CENTRAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 141