Summary
In Perl v. General Fire Cas. Co., 34 App. Div.2d 748, 310 N.Y.S.2d 196 (1970), the court determined that an attorney arbitrator whose practice consisted of representation of insurance companies, though in what particular aspect does not appear, and who also had an interest in a company which provided investigatory services for insurance companies was not required by the AAA rules to disclose such activities when appointed to arbitrate pursuant to a clause in an insurance policy.
Summary of this case from St. Paul Ins. Companies v. LusisOpinion
Decided July 9, 1970
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEALS GRANTED