From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pericak v. Hooper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1994
207 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 30, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Balio, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ. (Filed Aug. 25, 1994.)


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in concluding that this proceeding was not timely commenced. Election Law § 16-102 (2), as amended, "[b]y its clear and unambiguous language, * * * permits a proceeding to be commenced within three business days after the board `makes a determination of invalidity with respect to such petition'" (Matter of Godzisz v. Mohr, 197 A.D.2d 839). Because the date of determination was Wednesday, July 27, 1994, the first business day of the statutory period was Thursday, July 28, 1994 (see, General Construction Law § 20).

Inasmuch as the court did not rule on the specific objections to the petition, we remit the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings on the merits.


Summaries of

Matter of Pericak v. Hooper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1994
207 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Pericak v. Hooper

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STEPHEN PERICAK et al., Appellants, v. JAMES P. HOOPER et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
617 N.Y.S.2d 247

Citing Cases

Sirignano v. Sunderland

The Common-Law Rule Codified This common-law exception to the 14-day filing rule was codified into the 1992…

Rapp v. Wright

The respondents' bare conclusory assertion that the determination of the Board of Elections was made at some…