From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pelekanos v. City of New York [2d Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 16, 1999
694 N.Y.S.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted May 5, 1999

August 16, 1999

Julie Jorge Pelekanos, E. Elmhurst, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Leonard Koerner and Stephen J. McGrath of counsel), for respondent.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., DAVID S. RITTER, DANIEL W. JOY, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN and NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

In a proceeding to compel the respondent to conduct a hearing pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h before April 4, 1998, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lisa, J.), dated June 30, 1998, which, inter alia, denied the petition.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The law is well established that a potential plaintiff who has not complied with General Municipal Law § 50-h(1) is precluded from commencing an action against a municipality ( see, General Municipal Law § 50-h; Best v. City of New York, 97 A.D.2d 389, affd 61 N.Y.2d 847, for reasons stated below, Patterson v. Ford, ___ A.D.2d ___ [2d Dept., Nov. 9, 1998]; Heins v. Board of Trustees of Inc. Vil. of Greenport, 237 A.D.2d 570; Arcila v. Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 231 A.D.2d 660; Schrader v. Town of Orangetown, 226 A.D.2d 620). The petitioner here does not dispute the fact that a hearing pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h was adjourned six times at her request or that she failed to appear on the scheduled hearing date of March 30, 1998, despite being advised that it was the last hearing date available before April 4, 1998, the expiration of the Statute of Limitations for commencing an action to recover damages for personal injuries. Since the petitioner failed to provide an adequate excuse for her noncompliance with the respondent's demand for an examination pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h(1), the Supreme Court properly denied the petition, made on the eve of the expiration of the Statute of Limitations, to compel the defendant to hold a hearing ( see, Matter of Dickey v. City of New York, 167 A.D.2d 238).

O'BRIEN, J.P., RITTER, JOY, ALTMAN, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Pelekanos v. City of New York [2d Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 16, 1999
694 N.Y.S.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Pelekanos v. City of New York [2d Dept 1999

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JULIE JORGE PELEKANOS, appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 16, 1999

Citations

694 N.Y.S.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)