From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pecorino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 31, 1978
64 A.D.2d 711 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

July 31, 1978


In a proceeding to determine the validity of a right of election filed by Agnes Pecorino, petitioner appeals from a decree of the Surrogate's Court, Queens County, dated March 14, 1977, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, declared Agnes Pecorino to be the lawful widow of Antonio Pecorino. Decree affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Agnes Johnson and Antonio Pecorino traveled to Pennsylvania in 1953 for the specific purpose of entering into a common-law marriage. While there, they exchanged verbal marriage vows. Three days later they returned to New York and set up residence at Antonio's house in Brooklyn. Agnes' children by her first marriage also resided with the couple. Until Antonio's death in 1973, the couple held themselves out as husband and wife and were so regarded by numerous neighbors, friends and relative who testified at the trial of this proceeding. The issue presented by this appeal is whether the New York courts should recognize the common-law marriage thereby entitling Agnes to a right of election against Antonio's will (see EPTL 5-1.1). It is well established that New York will honor a common-law marriage if it was validly contracted in another State (Matter of Lieblein v Charles Chips, Inc., 32 A.D.2d 1016, affd 28 N.Y.2d 869). According to Pennsylvania law, a common-law marriage may be contracted when a present agreement to marry is followed by cohabitation and reputation as husband and wife (Matter of Craig, 273 Pa. 530, 533). Pennsylvania does not prescribe any particular period of cohabitation and reputation within its borders as a predicate for a common-law marriage (48 Pa Stat Ann, tit 48, § 1-23). A review of the record on this appeal reveals that a present agreement to marry may be inferred from the couple's conduct and declarations. This agreement was ratified by their every act in Pennsylvania, New York and elsewhere. A valid common-law marriage under Pennsylvania law having taken place, Agnes Pecorino is entitled to a right of election against Antonio's will. Rabin, J.P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Pecorino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 31, 1978
64 A.D.2d 711 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Matter of Pecorino

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of ANTONIO PECORINO, Deceased. ALEXANDER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 31, 1978

Citations

64 A.D.2d 711 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

Cross v. Cross

We believe that summary judgment should not have been granted, and we modify the order appealed from to the…

Mott v. Duncan Petroleum

Thus, before the court can undertake a review of the administrative fact-finding process which resulted in a…