From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pearson

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 9, 1995
139 N.J. 230 (N.J. 1995)

Opinion

February 9, 1995.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that WILLIAM R. PEARSON of WOODBURY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1967, be publicly reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(b) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice),

And respondent having filed a motion to strike portions of the Disciplinary Review Board's report, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and WILLIAM R. PEARSON is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter, and it is further

ORDERED that respondent's motion to strike portions of the Disciplinary Review Board's report is denied.


Summaries of

Matter of Pearson

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 9, 1995
139 N.J. 230 (N.J. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Pearson

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM R. PEARSON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 9, 1995

Citations

139 N.J. 230 (N.J. 1995)
652 A.2d 721

Citing Cases

In re Vazquez

See, e.g., In re Pinto, 168 N.J. 111 (2001) (attorney reprimanded, with the condition of sensitivity…

In re Becker

All reported cases that have addressed a violation of RPC 8.4(g) for sexual harassment have involved adult…