From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Peacock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 5, 1992
181 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 5, 1992

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Upon the Administrative Law Judge's decision that she was eligible to do so, claimant began receiving unemployment insurance benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently determined that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant's only argument on appeal is that, because the Administrative Law Judge ruled in her favor, she should not have to repay any of the benefits that she already received. We have previously held that payments made under similar circumstances are recoverable (see, Matter of Simone [Estate of King — Hartnett], 142 A.D.2d 768, 770).

Weiss, P.J., Mikoll, Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Peacock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 5, 1992
181 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Peacock

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of IRMA J. PEACOCK, Appellant. JOHN F. HUDACS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 5, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)