From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Payne v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 19, 1988
140 A.D.2d 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

May 19, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Clinton County.


Petitioner, an inmate at Clinton Correctional Facility in Clinton County, was found guilty of defacing his newly painted cell in the special housing unit in violation of the rules for inmate behavior ( 7 NYCRR 270.1 [b] [17] [i]) and assessed a penalty of 15 days' cell confinement and loss of certain privileges. His administrative appeal was denied because he failed to specify particular violations of due process rights or procedural requirements. As a result, he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, which was transferred to this court.

The record demonstrates compliance with all procedural requirements. Petitioner received notice, investigative assistance and an opportunity to prepare for and defend the charges against him. A hearing was conducted before a fair and impartial Hearing Officer whose determination was founded upon the requisite substantial evidence (see, Matter of Perez v Wilmot, 67 N.Y.2d 615; Matter of Gonzalez v Coughlin, 126 A.D.2d 800). Therefore, the determination should be confirmed.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Mercure, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Payne v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 19, 1988
140 A.D.2d 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Payne v. Senkowski

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MILTON PAYNE, Petitioner, v. D.A. SENKOWSKI, as Acting…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 19, 1988

Citations

140 A.D.2d 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Matter of Payne v. Senkowski

Decided September 15, 1988 Appeal from (3d dept: 140 A.D.2d 856) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…