From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1989
154 A.D.2d 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

October 6, 1989

Appeal from the Erie County Family Court, Killeen, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating him a person in need of supervision and placing him on probation for 12 months. The order must be reversed. The admission to the allegations of the petition was made by the Law Guardian and not by respondent personally. Further, the court never ascertained through allocution that respondent admitted to the acts alleged in the petition, that he voluntarily waived his rights to a fact-finding hearing and that he was aware of the possible dispositional orders (see, Family Ct Act § 741, 321.3). Accordingly, the court should not have accepted the admission (see, Matter of Jacqueline P., 149 A.D.2d 933; Matter of Ameer M., 145 A.D.2d 991; Matter of William C.,

140 A.D.2d 1004; Matter of Tomika M., 136 A.D.2d 951; Matter of Tina P., 135 A.D.2d 1105; Matter of Walter A., 104 A.D.2d 734; Matter of Kelly Sue N., 94 A.D.2d 976).

We are unable to determine, on this record, whether an educational neglect petition should be substituted for the PINS petition. Moreover, the propriety of making that decision should be addressed in the first instance by Family Court.


Summaries of

Matter of Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1989
154 A.D.2d 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Paul

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PAUL H., a Person Alleged to be in Need of Supervision

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1989

Citations

154 A.D.2d 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Matter of Rickey

The provisions of this statute apply to juvenile delinquency proceedings as well as to PINS proceedings (see,…

Matter of Edgar

n accepting respondent's admission, Family Court did not advise respondent of his right to a fact-finding…