From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Patrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 22, 1990
166 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

October 22, 1990

Appeal from the Family Court, Kings County (Greenbaum, J.).


Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On February 8, 1988, at about 12:15 P.M., the appellant and the complainant were attending a class at Erasmus Hall High School in Brooklyn. The teacher had divided the class into groups. The appellant and the complainant were assigned to the same group. At some point the appellant and the complainant started arguing over their classroom assignment.

The appellant testified that after he and the complainant started to argue he hit her in response to her hitting him. However, the appellant's own witness testified that although the complainant made a stabbing motion with her pen towards the appellant, the pen did not touch him. The teacher testified that she did not see the complainant strike the appellant and the complainant herself denied doing so.

We find that the evidence was of sufficient quantity and quality to establish that the appellant intended to cause serious physical injury to the complainant, by his infliction of a closed-fisted punch to her face during their classroom argument (see, People v. Bracey, 41 N.Y.2d 296, 301; People v. Gibson, 140 A.D.2d 453). Moreover, there was sufficient evidence to permit the court to conclude that the complainant, who as a result of the appellant's punch permanently lost one tooth and underwent an operation to replace two other teeth and to repair her gums, suffered serious physical injury within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (10) (see, People v. Howard, 79 A.D.2d 1064).

Finally, the account given by the complainant and the teacher, and obviously believed by the court, was sufficient to disprove the defense of justification. The court could properly have found that the appellant could not have reasonably believed that the complainant was about to use physical force against him such that he was compelled to resort to use of physical force to avert the perceived threat (see, People v. Goetz, 68 N.Y.2d 96). Brown, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Patrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 22, 1990
166 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Patrick

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PATRICK W., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 22, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
561 N.Y.S.2d 78

Citing Cases

People v. Wheeler

The uncontradicted testimony established that the defendant repeatedly punched the victim in the face and…

People v. Thompson

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620,…