From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Parmenter v. New York Telephone Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 15, 1983
98 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

December 15, 1983


Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed December 29, 1982, as amended by a decision filed April 11, 1983, which excused claimant's failure to give timely notice of accident. The board has found that claimant injured her right ankle on October 16, 1979 when she stepped into a hole in the company parking lot, but that she did not give notice to her employer until November 26, 1979 after she had received medical treatment for the first time. Failure to comply with the 30-day written notice of accident requirement (Workers' Compensation Law, § 18) was excused on the ground that she notified her employer as soon as she had knowledge of the nature and extent of her injury, requesting that a written report thereof be filed. As a further excuse, the board found that the employer had actual notice and knowledge of claimant's injury, since she continued to perform her duties in spite of an obvious disability. Thus, the board determined that there was a lack of any prejudice to the employer (see Matter of McEnaney v. Memorial Hosp., 80 A.D.2d 689, mot for lv to app den 53 N.Y.2d 606; Matter of Teague v. Rockville Reconditioning Center, 61 A.D.2d 874). Since the board accepted the course of events as testified to by claimant, we find substantial evidence to support its decision ( Matter of Celli v New York Tel. Co., 61 A.D.2d 1063). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers' Compensation Board. Mahoney, P.J., Sweeney, Kane, Mikoll and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Parmenter v. New York Telephone Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 15, 1983
98 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Matter of Parmenter v. New York Telephone Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of RAFFAEL PARMENTER, Respondent, v. NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1983

Citations

98 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Voight v. Rochester Products Division, GMC

We similarly find that it was within the province of the Board to excuse claimant's failure to timely file…

Matter of Thousand v. Human Res. Admin

Workers' Compensation Law § 18 Work. Comp. requires that notice of injury or death be given to an employer…