Opinion
June, 1931.
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.
Order denying motion for a peremptory mandamus order unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Parkcliff Company, Inc. v. Burden
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Summaries of
Matter of Parkcliff Company, Inc. v. Burden
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for
Matter of Parkcliff Company, Inc. v. Burden
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of the Application of the PARKCLIFF COMPANY, INC.…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Jun 1, 1931
Citations
233 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Citing Cases
Matter of Fairchild Sons, Inc. v. Rogers
The mere issuance of the permit would not disable the village board of trustees from changing the ordinance…
Matter of Dubow v. RossEven though a permit should issue, its issuance would be a futility in view of the change in the zoning…