From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Parisi v. Ward

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 9, 1974
313 N.E.2d 794 (N.Y. 1974)

Opinion

Argued March 28, 1974

Decided May 9, 1974

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department.

Thomas Owen Morgan and Charles R. Rattoballi for appellants.

Philip Schlau and Gerald L. Popovsky for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed on the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice FRED J. MUNDER. We would add that the collective bargaining agreement which petitioner claims cloaks him with otherwise inapplicable benefits under section 75 of the Civil Service Law, had expired prior to his dismissal and was not being renegotiated between the parties. It could not, therefore, provide him with his claimed relief. Absent proof that petitioner's dismissal was in direct violation of the exercise of any constitutionally protected rights or that the effect of his dismissal was to penalize the free exercise of such rights, petitioner lacked any contractual or statutory protection from summary dismissal ( Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564). Furthermore, since petitioner was not immune from summary dismissal, the claimed excessiveness of the penalty is rendered academic.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and STEVENS concur; Judge RABIN taking no part.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and determination of respondents-appellants reinstated in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Parisi v. Ward

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 9, 1974
313 N.E.2d 794 (N.Y. 1974)
Case details for

Matter of Parisi v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NICOLA PARISI, Respondent, v. TOM WARD et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 9, 1974

Citations

313 N.E.2d 794 (N.Y. 1974)
313 N.E.2d 794
357 N.Y.S.2d 503

Citing Cases

Matter of Parisi v. Ward

Decided September 18, 1974 Appeal from ( 34 N.Y.2d 746) MOTIONS FOR…

James v. Board of Education

However, a teacher in a public school system within the State of New York is a public employee and is…