Opinion
January 6, 2000
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 15, 1998, which reduced claimant's weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate.
Leah E. Pampanelli, Seneca, South Carolina, appellant in person.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Norman Uris of counsel), New York City, for respondent.
Before: CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, CREW III, SPAIN and CARPINELLO, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reducing claimant's benefit rate from $300 to $27 per week. The record establishes, inter alia, that claimant's pension was wholly funded by the employer. Although claimant opted to receive her pension in a lump sum which she then reinvested, the pro-rated weekly amount of such payment was $273, $27 less than the maximum weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate of $300 (see, Labor Law § 600 Lab.[7] [b]). Accordingly, claimant's unemployment insurance benefits were properly reduced to $27 per week based on the amount of her pension benefits (see, Matter of Chriscaden [Sweeney], 232 A.D.2d 803; see also, Matter of Scheiner [Commissioner of Labor], 263 A.D.2d 658, 692 N.Y.S.2d 835).
CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, CREW III, SPAIN and CARPINELLO, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.