From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Palmisano v. State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 12, 1963
20 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

December 12, 1963

Appeal from the Oneida Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Noonan, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party, petition dismissed, and determination of the State Liquor Authority confirmed. Memorandum: The determination of the Authority must be confirmed if there is proof that there was scope for the reasonable exercise of discretion by appellant. (Cf. Matter of Wager v. State Liq. Auth., 4 N.Y.2d 465, 468.) We find such proof in the record. The determination of appellant was neither arbitrary nor capricious (cf. Matter of Fiore v. O'Connell, 297 N.Y. 260, 262). It follows that the determination should have been confirmed by Special Term.


Summaries of

Matter of Palmisano v. State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 12, 1963
20 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Matter of Palmisano v. State Liquor Authority

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRANK PALMISANO et al., Respondents, v. STATE LIQUOR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 12, 1963

Citations

20 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)