From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pacis v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 1996
224 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 26, 1996


Cross motion by the respondent to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action.

Upon the papers filed in support of the proceeding and the cross motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the cross motion is denied, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, and the petition is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The respondent satisfied the requirement set forth in Penal Law § 400.00 (4-a) that he state in writing the specific reasons for his denial of the petitioner's application for a pistol permit.

We have reviewed the petitioner's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Bracken, J.P., Miller, Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Pacis v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 1996
224 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Pacis v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of REUBEN D. PACIS, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM K. NELSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 26, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 717

Citing Cases

Marino v. Hubert

Velez v. DiBella, 77 A.D.3d 670, 670, 909 N.Y.S.2d 83;Matter of Gonzalez v. Lawrence, 36 A.D.3d 807, 808, 831…

Benincassa v. Walsh

Here, in denying the petitioner's application for a pistol license dated March 8, 2016, the respondent failed…