From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ouimet v. Ouimet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 28, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1099 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 28, 1993

Appeal from the Oswego County Family Court, Roman, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Boomer, Davis and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: The Hearing Examiner determined that respondent had willfully violated Family Court's child support order but concluded that respondent could not be penalized for that violation because he had not been given the statutory warning notice (see, Family Ct Act § 453 [b]). We reject respondent's contention that the finding of a willful violation was not supported by sufficient evidence. The record supports the Hearing Examiner's determination that respondent had the resources to make the required child support payments but that he chose instead to apply his funds elsewhere, in disregard of the court's order and his daughter's welfare.

Respondent also contends that it was a denial of his right of due process for the Hearing Examiner to entertain the violation petition while deferring respondent's petition for modification of the prior child support order. Respondent did not raise that contention in his objections to the Hearing Examiner's order, thereby failing to exhaust Family Court procedures. That contention, therefore, is beyond the scope of appellate review (see, Matter of O'Leary v O'Leary, 139 A.D.2d 744; Matter of Werner v Werner, 130 A.D.2d 754; see also, Family Ct Act § 439 [e]).


Summaries of

Matter of Ouimet v. Ouimet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 28, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1099 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Ouimet v. Ouimet

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BARBARA A. OUIMET, Respondent, v. JOHN C. OUIMET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 28, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 1099 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
598 N.Y.S.2d 632

Citing Cases

Stoll v. Stoll

Accordingly, the father did not sustain his burden (see Matter of Hicks v. Hicks, 126 A.D.3d 975, 976, 7…

Matter of Jones v. McCullough

The record establishes that the combination of respondent's income and the payments received from petitioner…