From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MATTER OF ORR v. FREUDENHEIM

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

May, 1929.


Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, on the ground that claimant was not in the service of an employer engaged in one of the employments covered by the Workmen's Compensation Law (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 2, subds. 3 and 4; Id. § 3; Goldberger v. Goldberger, 200 App. Div. 190); and on the further ground that claimant was an independent contractor, ( Adel v. Rubin, 210 App. Div. 499; Matter of Beach v. Velzy, 238 N.Y. 100; Ball v. Estate of Bertelle, 201 App. Div. 768.) Van Kirk, P.J., Hinman, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur; Hasbrouck, J., concurs on the first ground stated.


Summaries of

MATTER OF ORR v. FREUDENHEIM

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

MATTER OF ORR v. FREUDENHEIM

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ERWIN H. ORR, Respondent, against LEO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)