Opinion
January 14, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The respondent Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York determined, inter alia, that the petitioner had failed to demonstrate the existence of unique physical conditions, as required by New York City Zoning Resolution § 72-21 (a) for the issuance of a variance. Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the Board's finding was supported by substantial evidence and was not illegal, arbitrary or an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn. v Klein, 51 N.Y.2d 963; Matter of Marchese v Koch, 120 A.D.2d 590; Matter of Shiner v Board of Estimate, 95 A.D.2d 831).
In light of this determination, it is not necessary to address the petitioner's remaining contentions. Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Lawrence and O'Brien, JJ., concur.