From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Orlando v. Board of Standards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 14, 1991
169 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

January 14, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The respondent Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York determined, inter alia, that the petitioner had failed to demonstrate the existence of unique physical conditions, as required by New York City Zoning Resolution § 72-21 (a) for the issuance of a variance. Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the Board's finding was supported by substantial evidence and was not illegal, arbitrary or an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn. v Klein, 51 N.Y.2d 963; Matter of Marchese v Koch, 120 A.D.2d 590; Matter of Shiner v Board of Estimate, 95 A.D.2d 831).

In light of this determination, it is not necessary to address the petitioner's remaining contentions. Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Lawrence and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Orlando v. Board of Standards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 14, 1991
169 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Orlando v. Board of Standards

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANN ORLANDO, Appellant, v. BOARD OF STANDARDS AND APPEALS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 14, 1991

Citations

169 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)