From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Orange County DSS v. Harold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 16, 1988
137 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

February 16, 1988

Appeal from the Family Court, Orange County (Ludmerer, J).


Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting therefrom the finding of a willful violation and the provision committing the appellant to jail for 90 days; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Orange County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

The record supports a finding of nonpayment of support and arrears pursuant to an outstanding order of the Family Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), entered July 19, 1985. However, under the circumstances of this case, it does not satisfactorily appear that the appellant's failure to pay was willful. It is well established that personal service of a certified copy of an order is not necessary to hold a party in contempt thereof if the party had actual knowledge of that order (Matter of McCormick v Axelrod, 59 N.Y.2d 574, 583, amended 60 N.Y.2d 652). The petitioner withdrew the initial violation petition upon discovering that no order of support had been signed or entered and promised to serve the appellant with a copy of the order of support after it was signed and entered. The record indicates, however, that the order which was entered on July 19, 1985 was not mailed to the appellant until June 1986 subsequent to the commencement of this proceeding, at which time he immediately commenced making support payments. Further, the record fails to indicate the appellant's present ability to pay the accumulated arrears (see, Matter of Rogers v Rogers, 77 A.D.2d 818; Matter of Abbondola v Abbondola, 40 A.D.2d 976; Matter of Kelley v Kelley, 31 A.D.2d 825). Accordingly, the matter is remitted for further proceedings on the petition to enforce the order of support, including a determination of the appellant's ability to pay the accumulated arrears. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Orange County DSS v. Harold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 16, 1988
137 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Orange County DSS v. Harold

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, on…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 16, 1988

Citations

137 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Parkes v. Paine

His argument is unpersuasive, as the statute provides protection to a noncustodial parent only where the…

Nassau County Department of Social Services ex rel. Velvet M. v. Hartley

Ordered that the order dated January 24, 1995, is reversed, on the facts and as a matter of discretion,…