Opinion
February Term, 1896.
Order reversed as to appellant, without costs to either party. Held, that the County Court erred in refusing an adjournment to enable the appellant to be heard and present its grounds of objection to the proceedings.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Opening Oneida Street
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 1896
2 App. Div. 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Summaries of
Matter of Opening Oneida Street
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 1896
2 App. Div. 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Case details for
Matter of Opening Oneida Street
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of Opening Oneida Street. City of Syracuse, Respondent, v…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Feb 1, 1896
Citations
2 App. Div. 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)