From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of One Hundred Forty-Ninth v. Prendergast

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 29, 1918
119 N.E. 1063 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued January 9, 1918

Decided January 29, 1918

William P. Burr, Corporation Counsel ( Charles J. Nehrbas and Terence Farley of counsel), for appellant.

John M. Harrington and Leon Forst for respondent.


Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of One Hundred Forty-Ninth v. Prendergast

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 29, 1918
119 N.E. 1063 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

Matter of One Hundred Forty-Ninth v. Prendergast

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of ONE HUNDRED AND FORTY-NINTH STREET…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 29, 1918

Citations

119 N.E. 1063 (N.Y. 1918)
119 N.E. 1063

Citing Cases

Williams v. State of New York

However, the language of the 1910 addition was general in terms in its application to changes of grade and…

Matter of Crane v. Craig

The change came with the statute amending the Highway Law, as above stated, so that after 1910 all…