From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Onasanya

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 22, 1996
224 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 22, 1996

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant worked part time as a home health aide for the employer from September 1992 through December 1992. After taking certain tests required by the employer, the employer offered claimant two other assignments. Claimant refused one assignment because the telephone company was scheduled to reconnect his telephone and the other because he wanted to attend a family outing. We find that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision that claimant refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Onasanya

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 22, 1996
224 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Onasanya

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MICHAEL A. ONASANYA, Appellant. JOHN E…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 812