From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Olsen v. Underhill Constr. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 27, 1963
20 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

December 27, 1963

Present — Bergan, P.J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.


Appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision and award of death benefits by the Workmen's Compensation Board on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to support the board's findings of industrial accident and causal relationship. Decedent, a 56-year-old carpenter, died from a subarachnoid hemorrhage. It is undisputed that on the day he was stricken decedent was working in an enclosed area where the air was made noxious by the heating arrangement. There is also testimony that decedent felt ill during the morning and vomited both after lunch and on returning home and substantial medical testimony to the effect that this retching and vomiting, considering decedent's medical history, could have caused a blood vessel in the brain to rupture resulting in the fatal hemorrhage. While there is also medical testimony denying any relationship between decedent's cerebral accident and his employment, the choice as to which medical opinions should be accepted resides in the board ( Matter of Palermo v. Gallucci Sons, 5 N.Y.2d 529). Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Olsen v. Underhill Constr. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 27, 1963
20 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Matter of Olsen v. Underhill Constr. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of SIGNE OLSEN, Respondent, v. UNDERHILL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 27, 1963

Citations

20 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Matter of Speregon v. Downtown Delicatessen

He had also examined the hospital records and the surgical report. As there were conflicting expert opinions…