From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Olivier v. County of Rockland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1999
260 A.D.2d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 12, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.

The petitioner, Frank Olivier, a corrections officer employed by the respondent County of Rockland, applied for benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c in September 1997, based on an alleged, work-related illness. In November 1997, before any determination on his application, Olivier commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the County of Rockland and Sheriff James F. Kralik (hereinafter collectively the County) to grant him benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c. Olivier asserted that he had prima facie established his entitlement to benefits, and that the County had waived its right to demand an independent medical examination.

The Supreme Court erred in directing the County to provide section 207-c benefits to Olivier pending a hearing and determination on his application and instead should have dismissed the petition on the merits. It is well settled that the County was not required to award benefits based on a prima facie showing of entitlement, but was permitted to order an independent medical examination before making a determination ( see, Matter of DePoalo v. County of Schenectady, 85 N.Y.2d 527).

We agree with the County that the Supreme Court's decision was apparently based on the erroneous assumption that Olivier had received section 207-c benefits and that those benefits had been suspended or terminated. As the record is clear that Olivier had not been previously paid benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c, the procedural protections afforded to those whose benefits are suspended or terminated were not applicable ( see, Matter of Schenectady County Sheriff's Benevolent Assn. v. McEvoy, 124 A.D.2d 911; cf., Matter of Meehan v. County of Tompkins, 219 A.D.2d 774; Matter of Dacey v. County of Dutchess, 121 A.D.2d 536).

O'Brien, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Olivier v. County of Rockland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1999
260 A.D.2d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Olivier v. County of Rockland

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRANK OLIVIER, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF ROCKLAND et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 580

Citing Cases

In Matter of Massi v. Flynn

It should also be noted that the Court is without the power to issue a mandamus compelling respondents to…

Schnurr v. Nassau County

Moreover, the petitioner was not entitled to a due process hearing. The respondents' denial of General…