From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of O'Hara v. Monaghan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 28, 1955
132 N.E.2d 310 (N.Y. 1955)

Summary

In O'Hara v. Monaghan, 309 N.Y. 931 (132 N.E.2d 310), a like conclusion was reached in an action brought by a member of the New York City police department to enforce his claim that he was entitled to a pension in a specified amount.

Summary of this case from Kelly v. City of Detroit

Opinion

Argued November 17, 1955

Decided December 28, 1955

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, GREENBERG, J., CORCORAN, J.

Peter Campbell Brown, Corporation Counsel ( Henry J. Shields and Seymour B. Quel of counsel), for appellants.

Lester G. Knopping and George Moon for respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, FULD, FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS, JJ. Taking no part: DYE and BURKE, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of O'Hara v. Monaghan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 28, 1955
132 N.E.2d 310 (N.Y. 1955)

In O'Hara v. Monaghan, 309 N.Y. 931 (132 N.E.2d 310), a like conclusion was reached in an action brought by a member of the New York City police department to enforce his claim that he was entitled to a pension in a specified amount.

Summary of this case from Kelly v. City of Detroit
Case details for

Matter of O'Hara v. Monaghan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRANCIS A. O'HARA, Respondent, against GEORGE P. MONAGHAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 28, 1955

Citations

132 N.E.2d 310 (N.Y. 1955)
132 N.E.2d 310

Citing Cases

Ornstein v. Regan

Appellant could not be deprived of his possessory interest to this property right. And where the denial of a…

Kelly v. City of Detroit

" In O'Hara v. Monaghan, 309 N.Y. 931 ( 132 N.E.2d 310), a like conclusion was reached in an action brought…