From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of O'Connor v. County of Erie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 19, 1999
259 A.D.2d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 19, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Michalek, J. — Renewal.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiffs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of plaintiffs to renew their prior motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim against defendant, County of Erie (County), but abused its discretion in adhering to its original determination. On their motion to renew, plaintiffs established that the County had actual notice of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days of its accrual ( see, General Municipal Law § 50-e) and that the County has not been substantially prejudiced as a result of the delay ( see, Passalacqua v. County of Onondaga, 94 A.D.2d 949). We therefore modify the order by granting plaintiffs' prior motion.

Present — Hayes, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Balio, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of O'Connor v. County of Erie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 19, 1999
259 A.D.2d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of O'Connor v. County of Erie

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT E. O'CONNOR et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF ERIE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 19, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 323

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Trusso

The court further properly determined that respondent or its agents had actual knowledge of the essential…

In the Matter of Lindstrom

t the failure of claimant to offer a reasonable excuse for her delay in serving a notice of claim or, indeed,…