From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of N.Y. Philomusica Chamber Ensemble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 27, 1990
165 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

September 27, 1990

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


There was substantial evidence in the record to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's conclusion that New York Philomusica Chamber Ensemble exercised sufficient direction and control over the services of its musicians to establish their status as employees (see, Matter of Captain Kishka [Hartnett], 158 A.D.2d 814, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 708). With respect to the nonmusician whose services are at issue, the evidence also established that he worked as an employee under the supervision and control of the company's artistic director. Although there was evidence in the record which could have supported a contrary conclusion, the evidence presented shows a sufficient amount of control to support the Board's determination of an employer-employee relationship (see, Matter of Villa Maria Inst. of Music [Ross], 54 N.Y.2d 691).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Casey, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of N.Y. Philomusica Chamber Ensemble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 27, 1990
165 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of N.Y. Philomusica Chamber Ensemble

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NEW YORK PHILOMUSICA CHAMBER ENSEMBLE, Appellant. THOMAS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1990

Citations

165 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
561 N.Y.S.2d 850

Citing Cases

North v. Young People's Chorus of N.Y.

YPCNY's president was the musical conductor at the concerts and was responsible for handling complaints about…

Matter of Franks

Finally, claimant appeared in photographs and promotional literature for the Band. In our view, while other…