From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nugent v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 5, 1998
255 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 5, 1998


Petitioner, a highway general foreman, applied for accidental disability retirement benefits because of injuries he allegedly sustained to his neck, back and arms after being attacked by a co-worker. Petitioner's application was denied on the ground that he was not permanently incapacitated from performing his employment duties. Substantial evidence supports the determination. Sherwood Greiner, an orthopedic surgeon who examined petitioner and testified as an expert on behalf of respondent State and Local Employees' Retirement System, opined that petitioner's subjective complaints of pain were inconsistent with the medical findings. It was Greiner's opinion that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from the performance of his employment duties. While petitioner presented medical testimony to the contrary, it is within respondent Comptroller's authority to evaluate conflicting medical evidence and to accept one medical expert's opinion over that of another ( see, Matter of Senecal v. McCall, 252 A.D.2d 630). Furthermore, the record fails to support petitioner's contention that he was denied a fair hearing., notwithstanding the fact that the Hearing Officer accepted the proposed findings of fact and conclusion of law of respondents counsel.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Nugent v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 5, 1998
255 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Nugent v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES NUGENT v. NEW YORK STATE AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 5, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 208

Citing Cases

Matter of Pellino v. McCall

According to Dentinger, his neurological examination of petitioner disclosed no functional limitation or…

Matter of Moore v. McCall

We confirm. Given the facts and the record before us, including petitioner's own description of her job…