From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nils TT. v. New York State Department of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 11, 1998
251 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 11, 1998


Upon petitioner's previous request to review a determination denying expungment of his name from the State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment ( see, Matter of Nils TT. v. New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 221 A.D.2d 874, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 812), we remitted the matter to respondent for a determination consistent with Matter of Lee TT. v. Dowling ( 211 A.D.2d 46, affd 87 N.Y.2d 699), utilizing the "preponderance of the evidence" standard.

Upon remittal, it was determined that expungment would be denied since the two reports concerning petitioner's maltreatment of his two daughters were supported by this evidentiary standard. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding contending that hearsay evidence alone cannot constitute the requisite "substantial evidence" to support that determination. We disagree.

Hearsay is admissible in expungment hearings and, "`if sufficiently relevant and probative, may constitute substantial evidence to support the underlying determination'" ( Matter of Ribya BB. v. Wing, 243 A.D.2d 1013, 1014, quoting Matter of Robert OO. v. Dowling, 217 A.D.2d 785, 786). To the extent that petitioner raises the question of substantial evidence, we find sufficient evidence throughout this record supporting the determination rendered ( see; People ex rel. Vega v. Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130, 139).

As to petitioner's contention that he should have been afforded a new hearing before a different Administrative Law Judge, again we disagree. We find no infirmity in the original hearing to require anything other than a new determination, upon the existing record, utilizing the proper standard of review ( see, Matter of Lee TT. v. Wing, 248 A.D.2d 785). Accordingly, respondent's determination is confirmed.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Nils TT. v. New York State Department of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 11, 1998
251 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Nils TT. v. New York State Department of Social Services

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NILS TT., Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 11, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 338

Citing Cases

Theresa WW. v. New York State Office of Children & Family Services

The remaining foster child was three years old at the time of the investigation and did not respond to the…