From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of New York Central Mutual Fire Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 2001
280 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

February 7, 2001.

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sconiers, J. — Arbitration.)

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., PINE, HAYES, KEHOE AND BURNS, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition granted.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court erred in denying the petition seeking a permanent stay of arbitration of a claim for supplemental uninsured motorist (SUM) benefits. Respondent was injured in an automobile accident on September 23, 1995. The insurance policy issued to her by petitioner required her to give notice of the SUM claim "[a]s soon as practicable", i.e., "with reasonable promptness after [she] knew or should reasonably have known that the tortfeasor was underinsured" ( Matter of Metropolitan Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Mancuso, 93 N.Y.2d 487, 495). Respondent gave notice of the claim for SUM benefits on March 16, 1999; the notice was denied by petitioner two weeks later on the ground of late notice. We conclude that the 42-month delay was unreasonable ( see, Matter of Travelers Ins. Co. [DeLosh], 249 A.D.2d 924, 925), and respondent failed to meet her burden of establishing a reasonable excuse for the delay ( cf., Matter of Travelers Ins. Co. [DeLosh], supra, at 925-926). The nature and extent of respondent's injury did not change from the time of the accident until the time when respondent provided petitioner with notice of the SUM claim ( cf., Matter of Travelers Ins. Co. [DeLosh], supra, at 925-926), nor did she demonstrate that she acted with due diligence in attempting to determine the insurance status of the tortfeasor ( see, Matter of Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v Wexler, ___ A.D.2d ___ [decided Oct. 2, 2000]; Matter of Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Montopoli, 262 A.D.2d 647). Respondent was aware of the identity of the tortfeasor on the day of the accident and was represented by counsel during most of the 42-month delay but provided no explanation for her failure to ascertain the tortfeasor's liability limits during that period of time ( see, Ciaramella v. State Farm Ins. Co., 273 A.D.2d 831; Owen v. Allstate Ins. Co., 250 A.D.2d 1018, 1019-1020). We therefore reverse the order and grant the petition seeking a permanent stay of arbitration.


Summaries of

Matter of New York Central Mutual Fire Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 2001
280 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of New York Central Mutual Fire Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 7, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 178

Citing Cases

CGU Insurance v. Nardelli

Consequently, the focus of the inquiry in notice of claim of underinsurance matters, whether it involves…

In re Arbitration Between State Farm Mutual

We conclude that Supreme Court should have granted the petition. Respondent failed to meet his burden of…