From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Neglia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 1989
146 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

May 15, 1989

Robert H. Straus (Mark F. DeWan of counsel), for petitioner.


The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on March 6, 1974, under the name Peter Philip Neglia.

On November 18, 1988, the respondent was found guilty after trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1961 and 1962 (c) (engaging in a racketeer-influenced and corrupt organization), 18 U.S.C. § 201 (c) (bribery of public officials), 18 U.S.C. § 201 (g) (unlawful receiving of gratuity while a public official), and 18 U.S.C. § 1503 (obstruction of justice). The respondent was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment, the longest of which was three years. In addition, the respondent was fined a total of $30,000 and assessed $200 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013.

Federal convictions of engaging in a racketeering enterprise and bribery of public officials are cognizable as class D felonies under New York Penal Law § 200.00, bribery in the third degree (see, Matter of Friedman, 127 A.D.2d 331; Matter of Shafran, 127 A.D.2d 353; Matter of Lazar, 127 A.D.2d 378 [engaging in a racketeering enterprise involving bribery of public officials]; Matter of Don, 117 A.D.2d 433; Matter of Phillips, 100 A.D.2d 69 [bribery of a public official]).

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the petitioner's motion should be granted. The respondent should be disbarred and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

MOLLEN, P.J., MANGANO, THOMPSON, BRACKEN and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent Peter Neglia, admitted under the name Peter Philip Neglia, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall promptly comply with this court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys ( 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent Peter Neglia, admitted under the name Peter Philip Neglia, is commanded to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.


Summaries of

Matter of Neglia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 1989
146 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Neglia

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PETER NEGLIA (Admitted as PETER PHILIP NEGLIA), an…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 15, 1989

Citations

146 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
541 N.Y.S.2d 453

Citing Cases

In re Bernard Meiterman

05 (2) (e) and § 155.30 (6)]; Matter of Christiansen, 220 AD2d 98, 99 [this Court found that respondent's…