From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Nazario v. New York State Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 11, 1982
86 A.D.2d 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

February 11, 1982


Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board filed October 3, 1980, which held that claimant sustained an accidental injury within the scope of the Workers' Compensation Law. On May 25, 1978, at 7:30 P.M., claimant, employed as a correction officer at the Walkill Correctional Facility, sustained a broken ankle while playing softball on the prison grounds. Claimant's team was comprised exclusively of coemployees and was managed by a sergeant at the facility. Participation was voluntary. Claimant testified that the essential purpose of the team was to promote employee morale. He further stated that written application to the superintendent of the institution was necessary for approval to use the field. The employer acquiesced in the use of its name on T-shirts worn by team members, but it does not appear that the employer provided financial support. Game scores and schedules were posted on the employer's bulletin board. The board, in reversing the referee's determination denying the claim, stated: "Upon review, a Majority of the Panel finds, based on the entire record and in particular, the claimant's testimony, that the claimant did, on May 26, 1978, sustain an accident within the meaning of the Workers' Compensation Law with resulting causally related disability." The determination of whether claimant's accident arose out of and in the course of employment presents a factual question for the board (see Matter of Wright v. General Elec. Co., 81 A.D.2d 722; Matter of Young v. Henry M. Young, Inc., 56 A.D.2d 941). Pertinent herein is the fact that the employer could terminate the athletic activities on its premises at will (see Matter of Tedesco v. General Elec. Co., 305 N.Y. 544; Matter of Vaccaro v. Sperry Rand Corp., 83 A.D.2d 678; Matter of Gore v. New York Air Brake Co., 33 A.D.2d 851). Moreover, it is not insignificant that the activity benefited employer-employee relations (see Matter of Devendorf v. County of Nassau, 77 A.D.2d 706; Matter of Burlingame v. Mobil Chem. Co., Div. of Mobil Oil Corp., 61 A.D.2d 273). In our view, there is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. The essential nexus between the softball game and the employer has been established ( Matter of Tedesco v. General Elec. Co., 305 N.Y. 544, supra). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers' Compensation Board. Mahoney, P.J., Sweeney, Kane, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Nazario v. New York State Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 11, 1982
86 A.D.2d 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of Nazario v. New York State Department

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JUAN NAZARIO, Respondent, v. NEW YORK STATE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 11, 1982

Citations

86 A.D.2d 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Montgomery County v. Smith

The rule enunciated in McNamara would not benefit Smith, because his recreational activity was not shown to…

Matter Wilson v. Detroit Hockey

Accordingly, it cannot be said that his exertion of August 16, 1979 was intended solely to prepare himself to…