From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Nammack v. Creelman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 18, 1912
99 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1912)

Opinion

Argued June 3, 1912

Decided June 18, 1912

John J. Curtin for appellant.

Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel ( Terence Farley and Elliot S. Benedict of counsel), for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WERNER, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ. Absent: WILLARD BARTLETT, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Nammack v. Creelman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 18, 1912
99 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1912)
Case details for

Matter of Nammack v. Creelman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of WILLIAM H. NAMMACK, Appellant, for a…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 18, 1912

Citations

99 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1912)
99 N.E. 1110