From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Muro v. Longnecker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 13, 1943
265 App. Div. 1027 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Opinion

January 13, 1943.

Appeal from State Industrial Board.

Present — Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ.


The sole contention of the appellants is that the State Industrial Board erred in holding Longnecker and his carrier as the sole employer and carrier. It is not disputed that claimant was injured in the regular course of his employment on the 26th day of November, 1940. The State Industrial Board found that claimant was an employee of Longnecker, working under his direction and was not an employee of Dominick Milone. The evidence sustains the finding of the Board. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

Claim of Muro v. Longnecker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 13, 1943
265 App. Div. 1027 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
Case details for

Claim of Muro v. Longnecker

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of TONY MURO, Respondent, against DAVID R…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 13, 1943

Citations

265 App. Div. 1027 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)