From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mulero v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 26, 1995
216 A.D.2d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 26, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Carey, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We reject the petitioner's contention that he was deprived of his right to due process by his assistant's failure to interview certain witnesses and to obtain certain documentary evidence in preparation for the petitioner's superintendent's hearing, since the record demonstrates that he suffered no prejudice as a result of these failures (see, Matter of Raqiyb v. Bartlett, 186 A.D.2d 327; Matter of Dixon v. Coughlin, 178 A.D.2d 984; Matter of Curry v. Coughlin, 175 A.D.2d 970; Matter of Irby v. Kelly, 161 A.D.2d 860).

Balletta, J.P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mulero v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 26, 1995
216 A.D.2d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Mulero v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LEO MULERO, Appellant, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN III et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 26, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
629 N.Y.S.2d 577

Citing Cases

Matter of Wade v. Coombe

There is no support in the record for the contention of petitioner that the determination of the Hearing…