From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mott v. Krug

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 18, 1938
17 N.E.2d 129 (N.Y. 1938)

Opinion

Argued October 17, 1938

Decided October 18, 1938

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Nassau County.

James L. Dowsey, County Attorney ( Marcus G. Christ of counsel), for appellants. Ferdinand I. Haber for Aaron A. Mott, respondent.

Herman Block for Edward M. Beirne, respondent.

James N. Gehrig for George R. Brennan, as chairman of the Republican County Committee of Nassau County, respondent.



In Matter of Burke v. Cohen ( 265 N.Y. 210) the distinction between constitutional officers and others was abandoned. The opinion in that case referred to city offices, but the principle upon which that case was decided applies to town officers, so that article X, section 5, of the State Constitution applies to an election to fill a vacancy in a town office. Since subdivision 5 of 461 section 64 of the Town Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 62) conflicts with this constitutional provision, it must be held to be invalid. We pass on no other question.

The order should be affirmed, without costs.

CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Mott v. Krug

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 18, 1938
17 N.E.2d 129 (N.Y. 1938)
Case details for

Mott v. Krug

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of AARON A. MOTT, Respondent, against PHILIP N. KRUG et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 18, 1938

Citations

17 N.E.2d 129 (N.Y. 1938)
17 N.E.2d 129

Citing Cases

Matter of Leonard v. Kratoville

(Italics mine.) (See Matter of Mott v. Krug, 278 N.Y. 457.) Intervenor's attorney at the hearing suggested…