From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Morris v. Canfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 26, 1963
19 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

November 26, 1963


Applying to this filiation proceeding the requirement that the evidence of paternity must be more than preponderant and must, indeed, convince "to the point of entire satisfaction" ( Commissioner of Welfare v. Rose, 283 App. Div. 781; Erie County Bd. of Social Welfare v. Holiday, 14 A.D.2d 832), we find the evidence less than satisfactory, both upon consideration of the entire record, which consists almost entirely of complainant's uncorroborated and occasionally suspicious testimony, and upon separate evaluation of the medical evidence, from which it appears improbable that the full-term baby was conceived on or after the date of complainant's first intercourse with appellant, as fixed by complainant's testimony. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and petition dismissed, with costs to appellant. Bergan, P.J., Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Morris v. Canfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 26, 1963
19 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Matter of Morris v. Canfield

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM MORRIS, as Commissioner of Public Welfare…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Matter of O'h. v. C

By the same token, however, it may be assumed that a matrimonial respondent is almost always able to prepare…

Morris v. “White”

I am constrained to agree. It has long been recognized that such a charge is easily made and hard to defend (…