From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Morgan v. Morgan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 1989
148 A.D.2d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

March 27, 1989

Appeal from the Family Court, Queens County (De Phillips, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The parties to this proceeding were married in 1981. There is one child of the marriage, Jessica, born on September 4, 1984. At the time of the custody hearing on August 25, 1987, Jessica was not yet three years old but had already experienced frequent changes of residence and de facto custody. The father had left the marital residence in March 1987 so that at the time of the hearing the mother had exercised de facto custody over Jessica for approximately six months.

At the hearing, testimony was adduced, inter alia, from both parties and a psychologist who had interviewed them. It was the psychologist's opinion that the father was more strongly bonded with the child and that the mother's capacity for concrete thinking might become impaired in stressful situations. However, neither party was found to be unfit for custody. The psychologist's recommendation was that custody should be transferred to the father for a period of three months, with a subsequent reevaluation. Additional testimony established that the father worked long hours and that the mother, who is not employed, would be at home and more available for the child.

We conclude that the Family Court's decision should not be disturbed. The record shows that the court considered every factor relevant to each party's suitability as the custodial parent. The court clearly indicated that it was awarding custody to the mother based primarily upon the child's need for stability, which would best be met by continuing the current custodial situation under the circumstances. It was not an improvident exercise of discretion for the Family Court to depart from the recommendation of the expert witness, especially as that recommendation was qualified by the expert, who requested that the matter be reviewed in three months (cf., Matter of Harvey v Share, 119 A.D.2d 823). Bracken, J.P., Brown, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Morgan v. Morgan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 1989
148 A.D.2d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Morgan v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STEPHEN MORGAN, Appellant, v. GLORIA MORGAN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 27, 1989

Citations

148 A.D.2d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
539 N.Y.S.2d 464

Citing Cases

S.R. v. W.R.

While Wife did not have a written Order of temporary custody at that time, the children were in her primary…

S.R. v. W.R.

While Wife did not have a written Order of temporary custody at that time, the children were in her primary…