From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MATTER OF MOR BAR GRILL, INC. v. O'CONNELL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 1950
277 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

June 13, 1950.

Appeal from Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department.


Findings of fact by an administrative agency should be sufficiently specific so that a reviewing court may be in a position to intelligently review such findings ( Matter of Scudder v. O'Connell, 272 App. Div. 251, 253). In announcing its determination here, the State Liquor Authority failed to specify the dates upon which it found that the violations charged occurred. However, as contended by respondents upon the appeal, it appears from the record itself that the authority found that petitioner had violated section 65 Alco. Bev. Cont. of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law on September 23, 1949, and on November 5, 1949. There is substantial evidence to sustain such a finding as to each of these two dates. The determinations should accordingly be confirmed.

Peck, P.J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Determinations unanimously confirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to the respondents.


Summaries of

MATTER OF MOR BAR GRILL, INC. v. O'CONNELL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 1950
277 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

MATTER OF MOR BAR GRILL, INC. v. O'CONNELL

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MOR BAR GRILL, INC., Petitioner, against JOHN F…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 13, 1950

Citations

277 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Matter Danzo Estate v. Liq. Auth

The authority did not in reality reject the findings of the hearing officer, but rather merely changed the…

Huggins v. City of New York

Contrary to petitioners' assertions, DCA (or its hearing officer) need not separately state the grounds for…