From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Moore v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 1986
118 A.D.2d 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

March 17, 1986

Appeal from the Family Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.).


Order reversed, on the law, with costs, application denied, and the support provisions of the order dated April 5, 1983 reinstated.

The Family Court erred in granting the respondent's application for a downward modification in view of the failure of the record to reveal an unanticipated change in circumstances sufficient to excuse compliance with the terms of a consent order whose fairness, when it was entered into, was unquestioned (see, Matter of Lamaitis v. Mitchell, 80 A.D.2d 715, 716). Moreover, although the petitioner was habitually living with another man, there was not one scintilla of proof that she, by word or conduct, held herself out as his wife (see, Northrup v Northrup, 43 N.Y.2d 566; Smith v. Smith, 88 A.D.2d 658; Miklowitz v. Miklowitz, 79 A.D.2d 795, lv denied 53 N.Y.2d 604; Chalom v Chalom, 70 A.D.2d 944, appeal dismissed 48 N.Y.2d 654; West v West, 61 A.D.2d 841). Brown, J.P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Moore v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 1986
118 A.D.2d 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Matter of Moore v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FLORENCE M. MOORE, Appellant, v. NED K. MOORE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 17, 1986

Citations

118 A.D.2d 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Matter of Allen v. Bowen

In contrast, respondent commenced his own law practice and, although he did suffer financial hardship for a…

In the Matter of Kaplan v. Smith

"Absent a showing of an unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances, the support provisions of the…