From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Moore v. Catus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 1998
254 A.D.2d 360 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 13, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants' contention, the petitioner was a proper party to commence this proceeding. Since the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law art 6) (hereinafter FOIL) "has made full disclosure by public agencies a public right, the status or need of the person seeking access is generally of no consequence in construing FOIL and its exemptions" ( Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. v. Burns, 67 N.Y.2d 562, 566-567).

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding the petitioner counsel fees and costs ( see, Public Officers Law § 89 [c]).

The appellants' remaining contention is without merit.

O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Moore v. Catus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 1998
254 A.D.2d 360 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Moore v. Catus

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM D. MOORE, Respondent, v. LORNA M. CATUS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 13, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 360 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 728

Citing Cases

Matter of Town of Southold v. Catus

The appellants' contention that the petitioner lacked standing or capacity to institute this proceeding is…